A family that includes a member with a destructive personality, an addict, for example, goes through some common stages. There are periods of turmoil as the destructive personality damages himself and those around him; their are efforts by some members of the family to halt the damage, to get the destructive personality to stop. These efforts are often halting at first, partly because everyone loves that family member, partly because the depth of destructiveness isn't understood immediately. You hope, you pray, that they'll reverse course. You don't want to close communication, and you want to make sure they're welcome.
Eventually, though, the family comes to a crisis. A confrontation may occur, noisy, violently emotional, always painful. Sometimes the destructive personality turns back from the brink: sometimes he careens over the edge. Or sometimes the family refuses the confrontation, and is gradually sucked into the continuous drama, and everyone's lives are more and more dominated by the will and whim of the destructive one. Sometimes the family manages to largely expel the destructive one, find a way to circumscribe the damage they do.
The current Primates' Communique may be seen as the date that the Anglican Communion formally became TEC's co-dependent and enabler, and drew back from the brink of confrontation with TEC. The actual effect of the Communique (if any) will only be discernable with time. The sheer wackiness of paragraph 101 of the report of the "Windsor Continuation Group"
Any scheme developed would rely on an undertaking from the present
partners to ACNA that they would not seek to recruit and expand their
membership by means of proselytisation
is stunningly idiotic. Families that shy from confrontation are buying into the destructive one's patterns and pathways of destruction. And that, it may be, is what's happening here. I grieve.